0.00/0.10	% Problem    : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0.
0.00/0.10	% Command    : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 240 THM
0.09/0.30	% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
0.09/0.30	% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
0.09/0.30	% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
0.09/0.30	% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
0.09/0.30	% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
0.09/0.30	% CPULimit   : 1920
0.09/0.30	% WCLimit    : 240
0.09/0.30	% DateTime   : Wed Jul 30 06:33:19 EDT 2025
0.09/0.30	% CPUTime    : 
0.16/0.41	Running higher-order theorem proving
0.16/0.41	Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=240 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.9qJtC2znSA/E---3.1_1210.p
0.16/0.42	# Version: 3.0.0-ho
0.16/0.42	# Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNSSN.
0.16/0.42	# Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 240 seconds (1920 total)
0.16/0.42	# Starting ehoh_best_nonlift_nonlambdatoforall with 1200s (5) cores
0.16/0.42	# Starting post_as_ho10 with 240s (1) cores
0.16/0.42	# Starting new_bool_9 with 240s (1) cores
0.16/0.42	# Starting sh5l with 240s (1) cores
0.16/0.42	# new_bool_9 with pid 1294 completed with status 0
0.16/0.42	# Result found by new_bool_9
0.16/0.42	# Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNSSN.
0.16/0.42	# Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 240 seconds (1920 total)
0.16/0.42	# Starting ehoh_best_nonlift_nonlambdatoforall with 1200s (5) cores
0.16/0.42	# Starting post_as_ho10 with 240s (1) cores
0.16/0.42	# Starting new_bool_9 with 240s (1) cores
0.16/0.42	# SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1,,2,20000,1.0)
0.16/0.42	# Search class: HUUSF-FFSF11-SSSFFFNN
0.16/0.42	# Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 240 seconds (240 total)
0.16/0.42	# Starting new_ho_10 with 145s (1) cores
0.16/0.42	# new_ho_10 with pid 1297 completed with status 0
0.16/0.42	# Result found by new_ho_10
0.16/0.42	# Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNSSN.
0.16/0.42	# Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 240 seconds (1920 total)
0.16/0.42	# Starting ehoh_best_nonlift_nonlambdatoforall with 1200s (5) cores
0.16/0.42	# Starting post_as_ho10 with 240s (1) cores
0.16/0.42	# Starting new_bool_9 with 240s (1) cores
0.16/0.42	# SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1,,2,20000,1.0)
0.16/0.42	# Search class: HUUSF-FFSF11-SSSFFFNN
0.16/0.42	# Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 240 seconds (240 total)
0.16/0.42	# Starting new_ho_10 with 145s (1) cores
0.16/0.42	# Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
0.16/0.42	# Presaturation interreduction done
0.16/0.42	
0.16/0.42	# Proof found!
0.16/0.42	# SZS status Theorem
0.16/0.42	# SZS output start CNFRefutation
0.16/0.42	thf(decl_23, type, r: $i > $i > $o).
0.16/0.42	thf(decl_24, type, esk1_1: $i > $i).
0.16/0.42	thf(decl_25, type, esk2_1: ($i > $i) > $i).
0.16/0.42	thf(descr2, conjecture, (?[X1:$i > $i]:(![X2:$i]:((r @ X2 @ (X1 @ X2))))<=![X2:$i]:(?[X3:$i]:(((r @ X2)=(^[X4:$i]:(((X3)=(X4)))))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.9qJtC2znSA/E---3.1_1210.p', descr2)).
0.16/0.42	thf(c_0_1, negated_conjecture, ~((![X2:$i]:(?[X3:$i]:(((r @ X2)=($eq @ X3))))=>?[X1:$i > $i]:(![X2:$i]:((r @ X2 @ (X1 @ X2)))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(fool_unroll,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[descr2])])])])).
0.16/0.42	thf(c_0_2, negated_conjecture, ![X9:$i, X11:$i > $i]:((((r @ X9)=($eq @ (esk1_1 @ X9)))&~(r @ (esk2_1 @ X11) @ (X11 @ (esk2_1 @ X11))))), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_1])])])])])).
0.16/0.42	thf(c_0_3, negated_conjecture, ![X2:$i]:(((r @ X2)=($eq @ (esk1_1 @ X2)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])).
0.16/0.42	thf(c_0_4, negated_conjecture, ![X2:$i, X13:$i]:((((esk1_1 @ X2)=(X13))<=>(r @ X2 @ X13))), inference(arg_cong,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])).
0.16/0.42	thf(c_0_5, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$i > $i]:(~((r @ (esk2_1 @ X1) @ (X1 @ (esk2_1 @ X1))))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])).
0.16/0.42	thf(c_0_6, negated_conjecture, ![X2:$i]:((r @ X2 @ (esk1_1 @ X2))), inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(dynamic_cnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])])).
0.16/0.42	thf(c_0_7, negated_conjecture, ($false), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5, c_0_6]), ['proof']).
0.16/0.42	# SZS output end CNFRefutation
0.16/0.42	# Parsed axioms                        : 2
0.16/0.42	# Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 1
0.16/0.42	# Initial clauses                      : 2
0.16/0.42	# Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
0.16/0.42	# Initial clauses in saturation        : 2
0.16/0.42	# Processed clauses                    : 7
0.16/0.42	# ...of these trivial                  : 0
0.16/0.42	# ...subsumed                          : 0
0.16/0.42	# ...remaining for further processing  : 7
0.16/0.42	# Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 1
0.16/0.42	# Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
0.16/0.42	# Backward-subsumed                    : 0
0.16/0.42	# Backward-rewritten                   : 0
0.16/0.42	# Generated clauses                    : 5
0.16/0.42	# ...of the previous two non-redundant : 3
0.16/0.42	# ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
0.16/0.42	# Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
0.16/0.42	# Paramodulations                      : 1
0.16/0.42	# Factorizations                       : 0
0.16/0.42	# NegExts                              : 0
0.16/0.42	# Equation resolutions                 : 1
0.16/0.42	# Disequality decompositions           : 0
0.16/0.42	# Total rewrite steps                  : 0
0.16/0.42	# ...of those cached                   : 0
0.16/0.42	# Propositional unsat checks           : 0
0.16/0.42	#    Propositional check models        : 0
0.16/0.42	#    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
0.16/0.42	#    Propositional clauses             : 0
0.16/0.42	#    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
0.16/0.42	#    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
0.16/0.42	#    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
0.16/0.42	#    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
0.16/0.42	#    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
0.16/0.42	#    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
0.16/0.42	#    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
0.16/0.42	#    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
0.16/0.42	# Current number of processed clauses  : 4
0.16/0.42	#    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 2
0.16/0.42	#    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
0.16/0.42	#    Negative unit clauses             : 1
0.16/0.42	#    Non-unit-clauses                  : 1
0.16/0.42	# Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
0.16/0.42	# ...number of literals in the above   : 0
0.16/0.42	# Current number of archived formulas  : 0
0.16/0.42	# Current number of archived clauses   : 3
0.16/0.42	# Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
0.16/0.42	# Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
0.16/0.42	# Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
0.16/0.42	# Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
0.16/0.42	# Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
0.16/0.42	# BW rewrite match attempts            : 0
0.16/0.42	# BW rewrite match successes           : 0
0.16/0.42	# Condensation attempts                : 7
0.16/0.42	# Condensation successes               : 0
0.16/0.42	# Termbank termtop insertions          : 293
0.16/0.42	# Search garbage collected termcells   : 70
0.16/0.42	
0.16/0.42	# -------------------------------------------------
0.16/0.42	# User time                : 0.002 s
0.16/0.42	# System time              : 0.001 s
0.16/0.42	# Total time               : 0.004 s
0.16/0.42	# Maximum resident set size: 1804 pages
0.16/0.42	
0.16/0.42	# -------------------------------------------------
0.16/0.42	# User time                : 0.004 s
0.16/0.42	# System time              : 0.002 s
0.16/0.42	# Total time               : 0.006 s
0.16/0.42	# Maximum resident set size: 1728 pages
0.16/0.42	% E exiting
0.16/0.43	% E exiting
0.16/0.43	EOF